AT the age of 10, Brandon Frances screamed for hours
on end, suffered psychotic episodes and daily beat his mother.
A pediatrician in Perth diagnosed Brandon with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder when he was four, and for the next seven years he was constantly
medicated with a cocktail of up to six different drugs to control his behaviour.
Now 13, Brandon no longer takes the medication, is behaving and doing well at
school. Eighteen months ago doctors at a Perth public hospital clinic found
Brandon did not have ADHD, but a learning disorder. His entire treatment was
changed.
"Medication was killing my son," his mother Katherine says.
"Medication was causing him to have psychotic episodes. He did not have the
disorders, the disorders developed because of the drugs he was taking."
ADHD is loosely characterised as persistent and severe inattention,
hyperactivity and impulsive behaviour. It is one of Australia's most commonly
diagnosed and fastest-growing disorders among school-aged children. After the US
- where six million have been identified as having the disorder - and Canada,
Australia has the world's highest proportion of children diagnosed with it.
Australian studies estimate between 2.3 per cent and 6 per cent of children
around the country have the disorder. Its cause is unknown, but genetic,
cognitive, neurophysiological, family and environmental factors are thought to
contribute. There are no clinical or medical tests to diagnose it.
How the medical community is managing and treating ADHD is fiercely
contested. And last month it killed off the career of a pediatrician who
specialised in the treatment of children in Adelaide and Perth.
Harry Nash retired last month, tired of a decade-long battle with a cluster
of Adelaide doctors who repeatedly complained to the medical board about the
prescriptions he has given ADHD children. The group represents many of those in
the medical fraternity who believe the condition is widely misdiagnosed.
They are also horrified about so-called polypharmacy – the prescribing of
multiple drugs in young children to treat ADHD and related disorders. In some
cases, children – such as Brandon – as young as four have been prescribed
adult doses of powerful, psychotropic drugs for their conditions.
Support groups, doctors and parents are also questioning the quick-fix
solution provided by stimulant drugs such as dexamphetamine and Ritalin.
These drugs, prescribed to calm and focus ADHD children, are at the frontline
of treatment. Yet teachers have described students in classrooms in a
zombie-like state, stoned on drugs.
Between August 2003 and July 2004, 305,638 prescriptions were written for
dexamphetamine and 208,235 scripts were issued for methylphenidate, commonly
sold as Ritalin.
Yet there are some parents who argue their ADHD children must remain
medicated, such as Judith Naylor-Vane, the Adelaide mother of 13-year-old Timmy.
Nash diagnosed Timmy with ADHD when he turned three. Before Timmy began
school he was taking anti-depressants and dexamphetamine. Today, he also takes
benzodiazepine for anxiety, and Clonidine to sleep. Concerned about dangerously
high levels of drugs prescribed by his pediatrician, hospital psychiatrists
tried to detoxify Timmy a few years ago. Doctors also complained to the medical
board in the late 1990s about how Nash was treating Timmy without his mother's
knowledge.
"They took him off the drugs but over time they put him back on
everything," says Naylor-Vane.
When he was off drugs "he went straight back to panic attacks, going
into himself; you couldn't reach him".
Taylor-Vane says Timmy has ADHD, features of autism, obsessive-compulsive
disorder, different phobias, problems sleeping and many anxieties. This
co-morbidity – having different disorders alongside ADHD – is not uncommon.
About 50 to 80 per cent of children diagnosed with ADHD also meet the
criteria for at least one other disorder, such as oppositional defiance
disorder, conduct disorder and Tourette's syndrome, according to the Learning
and Attentional Disorders Society of Western Australia.
Nash says he was hounded from his job because he supports prescribing
multiple drugs for children such as Timmy.
"They often have depression, so you need to treat that," Nash says.
"And if there's an anxiety disorder, that needs to be treated too. You have
to treat each disorder separately."
Until his retirement, Nash was one of a small group of specialist
pediatricians around Australia operating clinics to treat ADHD.
Prominent South Australian child psychiatrist Jon Jureidini, head of the
psychological medicine department at Adelaide's Women's and Children's Hospital,
is one of their chief critics.
He led complaints against Nash before the Medical Review Board of South
Australia. "They are responsible Australia-wide for the vast majority of
poly-pharmacy and high-dose prescribing and those who adopt that approach tend
to do it in a lot of kids," he says.
Doctors are allowed to prescribe so many drugs for children because "you
don't have to prescribe according to the guidelines ... I guess it shows a flaw
in the medical system that that can happen," Jureidini says.
He dismisses suggestions ADHD is a disorder. "I just don't think that it
is right that there are that many children around who have four or five
different things wrong with them," he says.
"So when you have got a kid with ADHD and oppositional defiance disorder
and depression and anxiety disorder and stuff, what this says is not that he has
got four disorders, but that there is something wrong with the kid and people
haven't properly understood what it is yet." Jureidini says in some cases,
abuse or neglect may be 100 per cent responsible for children's behaviour. In
other cases, parenting has very little to do with it.
The president of Australia's Hyperactivity Attention Disorder Association,
Julie Appleton, reacts testily when told of claims from child psychiatrists such
as Jureidini that ADHD is not a disorder.
"For God's sake, which part of the Ark did he get off?" she asks.
Appleton says parents should first check children's diets for food
intolerance and allergies, many of which are not found in junk food, but from
foods with naturally occurring chemicals such as tomatoes and orange juice.
Only when this has been ruled out should parents look at options such as
medication.
"This is 2005, we are not scared of medication," Appleton says.
"What we are scared of is the incredible depression in children that comes
from these problems [having ADHD] because they are ostracised at school and not
socially acceptable." The highly emotional and controversial debate about
treatment has featured at state and federal parliamentary inquiries, among
hospitals and at medical board hearings around Australia. A parliamentary report
in Western Australian last October concluded it was not clear whether ADHD was
the cause of dysfunction in children, or whether it was the result of family or
other dysfunction. It concluded up to three-quarters of affected children may
have been wrongly diagnosed.
Western Australia has the highest number of prescriptions dispensed for
dexamphetamines at three and a half times the national average. A federal
parliamentary library study of prescribing rates reached no conclusion for this
disparity but said: "It appears that Australia still has some distance to
go before achieving best practice in the prescribing of medication for the
treatment of ADHD."
The National Health and Medical Research Council last issued guidelines for
ADHD treatment in 1997. It recommends the short-term use of stimulant medication
as safe and effective, and part of any management plan. But the NHMRC says
medication should be used with caution among toddlers and pre-schoolers. Expert
opinion should be sought when multiple drugs are considered to treat other
co-morbid conditions. Counselling and education for families and children should
be part of treatment alongside medicine, it says.
But this view is under attack. A drug effectiveness review by Oregon State
University in the US was released this week into the effectiveness of ADHD
stimulant drugs and found little evidence they were safe, effective or boosted
children's performance at school.
It's a view heartily endorsed by parents such as Katherine Frances, angry she
went through years of hell because her son was wrongly diagnosed and placed on
so much medication.
"If my child, who they [doctors] thought would always be medicated can
survive and do better without medication then I think all children should be
given the opportunity Brandon has been given," she says.