Author: Sheila Matthews

2024/05/09

According to data recently received from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a psychiatric watchdog organization, there are nearly 2,000 0-to 5 years olds taking psychiatric anti-anxiety drugs in the State of Connecticut. Despite this stunning data, during the most recent Connecticut Behavioral Health Partnership Oversight Council (BHPOC) meeting that oversees the massive mental health system in the State of Connecticut, co-chair, Terri DiPietro, claimed that oversight of the number of children in Medicaid taking prescribed psychiatric mind-altering drugs is not part of the Council’s mission. 

In fact, it appears that none of the concerns regarding psychiatric behavioral health drug use is part of the council’s oversight even though the State of Connecticut passed Public Act 0124 approved June 28, 2001, which was intended to ensure this important drug information was part of the oversight. 

2024/04/16

Tennessee had proposed the first law aimed at addressing three basic reforms which, for more than two decades, have been largely overlooked in the aftermath of mass shootings across the United States. The proposed legislation had broad support, with sponsors in both the House and Senate, as well as backing from multiple organizations representing a vast majority of Tennesseans. Much needed reforms.

These reforms would have addressed three fundamental issues:  The psychiatric medication history – the specific psychiatric drug or cocktail of drugs the shooter had been prescribed, and the shooter’s mental health history, including the name of the treating psychiatrist, and the relationship between the behavioral health vendor or contractor and the state and federal government. Good legislative actions that went nowhere. Why?

AbleChild Rumble Appearance on “The Flame” & The Request for The Hatch Amendment

AbleChild was delighted to join the team on The Flame podcast.  During our guest appearance, we were asked to write an article relating to the Hatch Amendment to educate parents how to use it.  So, here we go.

First, parents must understand that Federal law has us all in an “opt out” position.  What does this mean?  Your child is automatically in a position of “opt in” or enrolled into all the nasty programs of the archaic public education system.

Therefore, in order for your child not to participate in any of these programs that do not agree with your family moral compass, the answer is to “opt out.”   This works for an activity, a class, or an event.

So how do you do it?  The Hatch Campaign PDF, the letter.

For years now, even decades, the left has been trying to grab guns from law abiding Americans. Usually, the cries to disarm begin just after a mass shooting, especially school shootings. The Second Amendment is a mighty force, though, and law makers understand removing those rights from the Constitution are simply pipe dreams. So, rather than use the full frontal to remove guns from American homes, the left is doing and end-around, bringing in none other than the most fraudulent of medical voodoo, psychiatry. 

Police in Maine are being accused of ‘abdication of responsibility’ for not seizing Army Reservist, Robert Card’s weapons prior to Card’s killing rampage last October. The findings are the result of a report issued by Maine Governor, Janet Mills’, controversial panel and the evidence made public does not support this conclusion.

When one closely watches the body cam footage taken by police while interacting with Card prior to the Reservist’s mental health “treatment,” at the military barracks in New York, something seems wrong.

For instance, the State of Maine denies that Card was forced to undergo psychiatric “treatment,” but the police body cam footage, and Card, himself, tells a different story.

Behavioral Health Industry Influence in Investigations Produces Conflicts of Interest in Mass Shootings

In a new twist associated with school shootings, parents now are on trial when their child commits the unthinkable.  Does this make sense?  No. But the public is getting to watch the second part of the Crumbley trial – James Crumbley, the father, in Michigan, whose son, Ethan, killed four at Oxford High School in November of 2021. The prosecution is making the shooting about the parents’ failure to get Ethan mental health treatment and providing Ethan with a gun. But there is much more going on.

It sounds like the family had plenty of access to mental health. Remember the mother, Jennifer Crumbley, has already been found guilty of manslaughter (failing to secure a gun and ammunition at home and failing to get help to support Ethan Crumbley’s mental health).

The fact is that James and Jennifer Crumbley met with the school counselors just hours before the shooting occurred. Apparently, everyone agreed (including the school counselors) that Ethan was fine to stay at school that day. And, at trial, the prosecution witness psychiatrist Dr. Lisa Anacker said the son, did not meet the statutory definition of being mentally ill.

LEWISTON, Maine – Big news on the Robert Card case.  After fatally shooting 18 people, 40-year-old Robert Card was hunted down by authorities and found dead days later.  

Interestingly enough, Maine’s Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Mark Flomenbaum, shipped Robert Card’s brain to Boston University’s CTE center for further investigation. The investigation of Card’s brain has revealed “significant evidence of traumatic brain injuries at the time of the shootings.”  Wow. That’s interesting. This crazed shooter actually was suffering from a real medical condition.   

There were no findings disclosed about the medical “condition” Card suffered from according to Maine’s Chief Medical Examiner’s office that also prohibited the CME from determining the time of death.  Remember this undisclosed medical condition would be described by the Medical Examiner as being associated with all the blood draining from Card’s heart making it impossible to determine the time of death.

Unraveling the Ethical Quandary:

Conflict of Interest in Police Investigations with Pharmaceutical Products at Crime Scenes

As the intersection of pharmaceutical products and crime scenes becomes increasingly prevalent, a complex ethical dilemma emerges within police investigations. The presence of pharmaceutical substances at crime scenes introduces a significant conflict of interest, raising questions about the impartiality and integrity of law enforcement procedures.  This is all the more concerning when NAMI, the National Alliance of the Mentally Ill is involved in training police officers.  NAMI is funded by big Pharma.  It is not only the substances found at the crime scene, but the substances given as “treatment” for “mental health.”  The public health departments, and police departments are more focused on getting people onto the drugs than safely getting them off.

This video interview delves into the intricate challenges posed by the involvement of pharmaceutical products in criminal activities, shedding light on the ethical considerations that arise when investigating such cases.  For more information or to sign the petition for federal hearings, please visit our organization AbleChild.org.  LINK TO PETITION